Active@ Partition Manager vs FreeBSD gpart
| Active@ Partition Manager | FreeBSD gpart | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | self-hosted |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Bootable media | Yes | Yes |
| Partition table support | both | both |
| Filesystem support | FAT, NTFS, exFAT, ReFS, HFS+, Ext2/Ext3/Ext4, BtrFS, UFS, XFS, JFS | UFS, UFS2, ZFS, APFS, HFS, HFS+ |
| Operating systems | windows | — |
| Move partitions | No | — |
| Merge partitions | No | — |
Both are listed in Best Disk Partition Software. On The Geeks Club, FreeBSD gpart scores higher on our published basis.