Allure TestOps vs TestDino
| Allure TestOps | TestDino | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $49/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Supported frameworks | Playwright, Playwright Java, WebdriverIO, TestCafe, Cypress, CodeceptJS, Jest, Vitest, Mocha, Jasmine, Ava, Node.js Test Runner, Bun, Cucumber.js, Newman, JUnit 5, JUnit 4, TestNG, Spock, Cucumber-JVM, JBehave, pytest, Pytest-BDD, Behave, Robot Framework, NUnit, xUnit.net, Reqnroll, Go, Dart and Flutter, PHPUnit, Codeception, Behat, RSpec, Cucumber.rb, Rust Cargo Test | Playwright |
| CI/CD integrations | Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, TeamCity, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, Tekton | GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps, TeamCity, CircleCI |
| Flaky-test detection | Yes | Yes |
| Failure analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Execution trend reports | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted deployment | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 49 /mo |
| Data retention | — | 90 days |
Both are listed in Best Test Analytics Software. On The Geeks Club, TestDino scores higher on our published basis.