Asciidoctor vs Natural Docs
| Asciidoctor | Natural Docs | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Source inputs | AsciiDoc files; AsciiDoc strings | source code, text files |
| CI/CD integration | Yes | — |
| Output formats | HTML 5, XHTML, DocBook 5, man pages, PDF, EPUB3, Reveal.js, Bespoke | HTML |
| Programming languages | Ruby, Java, JavaScript, JVM languages | ActionScript, Ada, Assembly, C, C++, C#, ColdFusion, Fortran, Java, JavaScript, Lua, Makefiles, MSBuild Files, Pascal/Delphi, Perl, PHP, PL/SQL, PowerBuilder, PowerShell, Python, R, Ruby, SystemVerilog, Tcl, Text Files, Visual Basic |
| API reference generation | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Documentation Generators. On The Geeks Club, Asciidoctor scores higher on our published basis.