Overview

Firms configure practice areas and jurisdictions to receive matching opportunities, then can automate proposals and track referral milestones. The focus is operational referral management, not broad legal marketing. Its value depends on whether a firm can use the matching workflow and meet the platform’s requirements.

Attorney Share characterizes itself as technology for connecting attorneys, not an attorney referral service. Its terms require membership in an attorney membership organization made available by Justice HQ, LLC for most features, including account creation. Referral transactions also require client consent, proper disclosure and compliance with applicable rules or statutes. Firms should resolve those obligations before relying on the service.

Key features

Matching, ratings and proposals

Practice-area and jurisdiction settings determine which opportunities reach a firm. Each case receives an AI lead-quality rating—Excellent, Strong, Fair or Limited—which can help prioritize review, but should not replace a firm’s own assessment. Users can configure automatic proposals for cases that match their filters, reducing repetitive outreach while making careful filter setup important.

Referral tracking and integrations

Referral status milestones can sync automatically with connected case-management tools. Integrations include Clio Grow, Clio Manage, MyCase, Lead Docket, Salesforce & Litify, and Lawmatics Intake. That sync may suit firms already working in those systems; it offers less practical advantage to firms whose tools are not covered. Supio Intake is described as coming soon, with AI writing the referral for the user. A Direct Share API is also linked, but its role is not clear enough to assess. For help with specific tools, the integrations page directs users to support@attorneyshare.com.

Customer data processed on a customer’s behalf is governed by that customer’s policies and contracts with Attorney Share. Firms should account for that arrangement when assessing their own data-handling responsibilities.

Pricing

Pay Per Signed Case

This plan is 0.00 USD per month (billed $0 per month), with a one-time match fee of $49-$299 only when a client is successfully signed. It includes unlimited cases and all features, with no upfront commitments or fee cuts. The absence of a monthly charge makes it the lower-risk starting point for firms with irregular referral volume; the variable fee means costs rise with successful matches.

Flat Monthly Pricing

At 999.00 USD per month (billed $999 per month), this plan includes unlimited signed cases, no per-case match fees, full platform access and no fees for private network cases. It is aimed at firms with enough signed-case activity to prefer a fixed monthly bill over match fees. Compared with the pay-per-signed-case option, its substantial recurring cost is harder to justify for firms handling fewer referrals.

Platforms

Attorney Share supports web and API access. The named integrations connect its referral workflow with several legal intake, case-management and CRM tools, but the platform fit is strongest for firms already using those systems.

Who it's for

Attorney Share suits firms that want case referrals routed by practice area and jurisdiction, use supported connected software, and can satisfy its membership and client-consent requirements. It is less suitable for firms seeking a general-purpose marketing tool, firms outside the stated eligibility framework, or teams that need integrations beyond those named.

Pros and cons

Pros: The $0 monthly option charges a $49-$299 match fee only after a successful client signing, avoiding fixed costs for firms with uneven referral volume.
Pros: Matching, AI ratings, automatic proposals and milestone syncing bring several referral tasks into one workflow.
Pros: Integrations cover multiple legal practice and intake tools, including Clio, MyCase and Lawmatics Intake.
Cons: Most features require membership in an organization made available by Justice HQ, LLC, narrowing eligibility.
Cons: The $999 monthly plan is a large fixed commitment for firms that do not sign enough cases to benefit from eliminating per-case fees.
Cons: Client consent, proper disclosure and compliance with applicable rules or statutes remain necessary for referral transactions.

Alternatives

ReferDesk is a free platform for macOS, web and Windows, and may suit readers looking for a no-cost referral option across those platforms. Avago is a freemium web tool with AI website generation and content assistance, a better fit for website creation than case-referral management. Law Firm Central offers a free hosted firm page with a lead form and basic SEO, with a $497.00 USD per month Starter plan; choose it when firm presence and lead capture matter more than referral matching. Mainfolk has a free plan with a custom subdomain, unlimited edits and about 10 AI assists per month, and supports Android, iOS and web; it is an option for firms focused on a simple web presence. Overture Law makes posting referrals and sharing fee splits free, while membership for attorneys receiving referrals is paid; it may suit users prioritizing referral posting and fee-split sharing. Saturney is a paid web platform with a free trial. LegalSpark is a paid web service with a free trial and a Starter plan at 199.00 USD per month, aimed at AI-assisted marketing content rather than referral routing. Birdeye is a paid platform for Android, API, iOS and web, with pricing dependent on locations and deployment; it is an alternative for readers evaluating a location-based platform.

For more options, see Legal Marketing Software.

Verdict

Attorney Share is a strong fit for eligible firms that want practice-area and jurisdiction matching, proposal automation and referral-status syncing, especially if they already use a supported integration. The pay-per-signed-case plan makes it accessible without a monthly bill, but firms should look elsewhere if they cannot meet its membership and referral-compliance requirements or cannot justify the $999 monthly alternative.

	Attorney Share	LawLytics
Free plan	Yes
Paid from	$999/mo
Platforms	api, Web	Web
Free plan	Yes
Referral management	Yes
Practice-area pages		Yes
Lawyer profiles		Yes
Consultation booking		Yes
Location pages		Yes
Resource library		Yes

Attorney Share vs LawLytics

Attorney Share

LawLytics