Black Duck Coverity vs RISC-V GNU Toolchain
| Black Duck Coverity | RISC-V GNU Toolchain | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Debugger included | — | Yes |
| SDK components | — | GCC, binutils, GDB, Newlib, Picolibc, glibc, musl, uClibc, QEMU, Spike |
| Target architectures | — | RV32 and RV64 with standard RISC-V extensions; configurable multilib targets |
| Host platforms | — | Linux, macOS, Windows via Linux subsystem or Cygwin |
| Build systems | — | Autotools configure and Make |
| Debug interfaces | — | GDB simulator, QEMU, Spike |
| License model | — | open-source |
Both are listed in Best Embedded Systems Toolchains. On The Geeks Club, RISC-V GNU Toolchain scores higher on our published basis.