cargo-llvm-cov vs Codecov
| cargo-llvm-cov | Codecov | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $5/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | api, extension, self-hosted, Web |
| Coverage types | line, region, function, branch, MC/DC | line, branch, project, patch |
| Supported languages | Rust, C, C++ | Bash, C, C#, C++, Clojure, D, Dart, Elixir, Erlang, Fortran, F#, Go, Haskell, Java, JavaScript, Julia, Lua, MATLAB, Perl, PHP, Python, R, Ruby, Rust, Salesforce, Scala, TypeScript, Vala, Xcode, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Groovy |
| Report formats | HTML, text, JSON, LCOV, Cobertura, Codecov Custom Coverage | XML, JSON, TXT |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage gates | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Pull-request annotations | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On The Geeks Club, Codecov scores higher on our published basis.