cdist vs OpenText Server Automation
| cdist | OpenText Server Automation | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS | Linux, Windows |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Agent model | agentless | both |
| Patch management | Yes | Yes |
| Policy as code | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Alpine Linux, Archlinux, CentOS, Debian, Devuan, Fedora, FreeBSD, Gentoo, Mac OS X, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Redhat, Ubuntu, XenServer | Windows Server, Windows, Linux, UNIX, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Ubuntu, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Debian, Oracle Linux, VMware ESXi |
| Drift detection | — | Yes |
| Compliance reporting | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Configuration Management Tools. On The Geeks Club, cdist scores higher on our published basis.