Checkmarx SCA vs ComplyVigilance SCA
| Checkmarx SCA | ComplyVigilance SCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | €10/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Supported ecosystems | Java/Maven, JavaScript/TypeScript/NPM, .NET/NuGet, Python/PIP, PHP/Composer, Swift/iOS, Go, Ruby, C/C++/Conan, Unity, Perl/CPAN, Dart/Pub | npm, yarn, pip, PyPI, Poetry, Maven, Gradle, NuGet, Cargo, Go Modules, vcpkg, Conan, Pkg.jl, Hardhat, Truffle, Foundry, Docker Hub, OCI registries; C, C++, C#, Java, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Solidity, Julia |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | cloud | cloud |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On The Geeks Club, ComplyVigilance SCA scores higher on our published basis.