Coveralls vs ReportGenerator
| Coveralls | ReportGenerator | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | $10/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 10 /mo | — |
| Coverage types | line, branch | line, branch, method, full method, MC/DC |
| Supported languages | .NET, C/C++, D, Elixir, Erlang, FORTRAN, Go, Haskell, Java, JavaScript, Julia, Kotlin, Lisp, Lua, OCaml, Objective-C, PHP, Python, R, Ruby, Scala, Smalltalk, Swift | .NET, Java, Node.js |
| Report formats | LCOV, SimpleCov, Cobertura, JaCoCo, Gcov, LuaCov, Golang, Coveralls JSON, Pytest-Cov, Clover XML | HTML, Clover, Cobertura, OpenCover, SonarQube, TeamCity, lcov, XML, JSON, LaTeX, text, CSV, Markdown, SVG, badges |
| Pull-request annotations | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | — |
| Historical trends | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage gates | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On The Geeks Club, Coveralls scores higher on our published basis.