CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted vs sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service
CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted
5.7 #23 in Code Signing Software
About CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-HostedsslTrus Remote Code Signing Service
6.4 #14 in Code Signing Software
About sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service| CyberArk Code Sign Manager - Self-Hosted | sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $6.25/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | Linux, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Supported targets | Code-signing keys and artifacts handled by integrated signing applications; specific target formats not confirmed | Adobe AIR applications, Firefox XPI extensions, macOS applications, Java JAR files, Microsoft Authenticode formats (.exe, .dll, .ocx, .msi, .cab and kernel drivers), Microsoft Office macro/VBA files, and Silverlight XAP files |
| Cloud signing | No | Yes |
| HSM key protection | Yes | Yes |
| Approval workflows | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 75 /yr |
| Certificate provided | — | Yes |
| CI/CD signing | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Code Signing Software. On The Geeks Club, sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service scores higher on our published basis.