DepWarden vs FOSSA
| DepWarden | FOSSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | $19/mo | $168392.50/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | npm, PyPI, Maven, Gradle, Go, RubyGems, Cargo, NuGet, Composer, Dart (Pub), Swift | JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | No | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | hybrid | hybrid |
| Monitored projects | — | 10 projects |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On The Geeks Club, FOSSA scores higher on our published basis.