FOSSA vs FossID Workbench
| FOSSA | FossID Workbench | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $168392.50/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | Web, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl | JavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBT |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Monitored projects | 10 projects | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | hybrid |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best Open Source License Compliance Software, Best Dependency Management Software. On The Geeks Club, FOSSA scores higher on our published basis.