FossID Workbench vs Grype
| FossID Workbench | Grype | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBT | Alpine, Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, SUSE, Amazon Linux, PyPI, npm, Maven, Go modules, Composer, NuGet, Pub, RubyGems, Crates, Swift, GitHub Actions, Bitnami, Conda, WordPress plugins |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On The Geeks Club, Grype scores higher on our published basis.