Harness Continuous Delivery vs Octopus Deploy
Harness Continuous Delivery
6.6 #16 in IT Release Management Software
About Harness Continuous Delivery| Harness Continuous Delivery | Octopus Deploy | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | $64.17/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment targets | Kubernetes, serverless, multi-cloud, on-premises virtual machines, mainframes, managed agent runtimes, edge devices, proprietary platforms | Kubernetes, Windows, Linux, Azure, AWS, GCP, cloud regions, containers, virtual machines, serverless functions, SSH, offline package drops |
| Deployment rollback | Yes | Yes |
| Approval gates | Yes | Yes |
| Concurrent deployments | 60 deployments | 5 deployments |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment audit log | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Deployment Automation Software, Best Continuous Delivery Software, Best Progressive Delivery Software, Best Kubernetes Deployment Tools, Best Release Orchestration Software. On The Geeks Club, Octopus Deploy scores higher on our published basis.