JuiceFS vs StarWind Virtual SAN
| JuiceFS | StarWind Virtual SAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 0.02 /mo | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | — |
| Storage protocols | POSIX, HDFS, S3, WebDAV | iSCSI, SMB3, NFSv4.1, NVMe-oF, iSER |
| Replication | Yes | — |
| Erasure coding | No | — |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | — |
| S3-compatible access | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software. On The Geeks Club, JuiceFS scores higher on our published basis.