NetApp SnapLock vs SMARCK
| NetApp SnapLock | SMARCK | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted | self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | on_premises | hybrid |
| Retention policies | Yes | Yes |
| Legal hold | Yes | Yes |
| Immutable archive | Yes | Yes |
| Deduplication | Yes | — |
| Supported data sources | NFS files; CIFS/SMB files; ONTAP snapshots; audio and video surveillance recordings; emergency phone records; WORM log files | Oracle, SQL Server, PostgreSQL, S3, files, email, audio, video, ERP, SaaS, databases, and unstructured data |
| Search and restore | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Data Archiving Software. On The Geeks Club, SMARCK scores higher on our published basis.