PHP_CodeCoverage vs Tarpaulin
| PHP_CodeCoverage | Tarpaulin | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | self-hosted | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Coverage types | line, branch, path | line |
| Supported languages | PHP | Rust |
| Report formats | HTML, XML, Clover, OpenClover, Cobertura, Crap4J, text, serialized PHP | JSON, stdout, XML, HTML, LCOV |
| Pull-request annotations | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On The Geeks Club, Tarpaulin scores higher on our published basis.