Protect Ads vs Spider AF
| Protect Ads | Spider AF | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | €29/mo | $10/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | api, Web |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Ad platforms supported | Google Ads; Microsoft Advertising (Bing Ads) | Google, Yahoo, Criteo, RTBHouse, Taboola, Logicad, Meta, X (Twitter), LINE, TikTok, Pinterest, SmartNews, Microsoft Ads |
| Automatic click blocking | Yes | Yes |
| Detection methods | IP and network reputation; VPN/proxy/data-centre detection; device fingerprint consistency; automation markers; click cadence, engagement and session patterns; location, language and targeting alignment | JavaScript tag device and session signals; lists; proprietary multiple-signal detection; GIVT and SIVT classification |
| Traffic reporting | advanced | advanced |
| Paid from | — | 120 /mo |
Both are listed in Best Click Fraud Software. On The Geeks Club, Spider AF scores higher on our published basis.